Critical Analysis of Mrs. Mallard - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 505 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2019/05/27 Category Literature Essay Type Critical essay Level High school Tags: The Story Of An Hour Essay Did you like this example? Culture teaches us that our existence is a mere reflection of what already exists. In Kate Chopinrs The Story of an Hour epitomizes the plight of women in the 19th century, as well as in the present day. Women frequently lived in loveless marriages where they were thought of more as commodities than as people. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Critical Analysis of Mrs. Mallard" essay for you Create order Additionally, Kate Chopin mirrors a reflection of society to show that women were not happy with the oppressive and submissive gender roles of 1890rs society. In the short story the character Mrs. Mallard could be said to represent women of her time period who were unable to find happiness in marriage and motherhood, not because itrs not found there, but because their freedom within marriage are restricted. Louise Mallard experiences what people in society today long for throughout their lives in relationships, freedom and happiness. Furthermore, immediately after the news of her husbandrs death, Mrs. Mallard races upstairs into her bedroom where she settles into a comfortable, roomy armchair (para. 4). The armchair symbolizes the rest from the oppressive life she had and freedom from societyrs expectations. Since it is tradition for women to be married by a certain age, Louise Mallard must have obligated to marry her husband Brently. Chopin suggests that all marriages, even the kindest ones, are inherently oppressive. During the 1890rs, women were owned by their husbands and had little to no control over their own live. Evidence of how little control women had over their lives can be found in the line from the story that reads, There would be no one to live for in those coming years; she would live for herself. Mrs. Mallard clearly has no hope for any independence or free will as long as her husband is alive. She admits that her husband wasnt really cruel to her but even if hes kind, even if he means well, he still has the power in the relationship. Therefore, the wife is always the lesser party. She must always bend to his will, she must live for him rather than for herself. A feminist critique shows how marriage does not allow for Mrs. Mallard to feel and sense of freedom or individuality. Bringing this inequality between genders to the forefront is one of the main goals of feminist literary criticism. Chopin shows through Louise Mallardrs musings that marriage where one person has more control than the other can make it harder for couples to love each other, because even though Mrs. Mallard feels for husband, her desire for her freedom is stronger. Even though this is years ago the same situations still occur today. The flaw in the marriage of the Mallards was definitely classified as an imperfection of life. It is very unfortunate that marriages have to be that way. In the time of the Realism period the marriages went wrong because the man thought he was superior to the women. Mrs. Mallard mirrors a reflection of womenrs independence who dream of getting out of the role playing Im just a wife.

Alexander The Great Essay - 1459 Words

There are many leaders in the world, but a great ruler is passionate, honorable and one who can inspire even in the most hopeless circumstances. Alexander the Great was a great ruler. Alexander the Great was a ruler that was not only inspiring, but he was fearless, smart, bold and courageous. Alexander the Great inspired his soldiers to crave more. He has inspired people since the day he started ruling. What is inspirational about Alexander the Great is that he inspired his troops to the point that they did not question him when they were outnumbered three to one in a battle, they trusted him with their lives and were willing to die for him (Alexander the Great: man behind the legend). There is not an age limit on being a great ruler,†¦show more content†¦Passion is something a great ruler must encompass. Ashoka the Great was passionate about establishing an empire based on world peace. Ashoka waged an extremely deadly war against the state of Kalinga; after this war, he con verted to Buddhism and never wanted to wage another war. He became passionate about peace after his awful experience (Ashokas Regret). He managed to accomplish this only because he was so passionate that he inspired people and they wanted to follow him. Alexander the Greats lifetime goal was to be a better ruler than his father was, this lead to his passion for expansion of his empire (Alexander the Great: Man behind the Legend). This passion is what drove him to lead his troop up Mountain Hindu Kush, even though he knew how dangerous it was, Alexander lead his troops up the mountain to do a surprise attack (Alexander the Great biography). The historians say that to go on the path Alexander did, up the mountain, would be impossible for pretty much everyone besides Alexander the Great and his army (. This passion lead to his victory. When one has a passion, there is very little that can be done to stop one from either succeeding or to die trying. Alexander won battles that historians say he should not have won; but because of his passion, he won anyways (Alexander the Great: man behind the legend). For example, he was in battles where he was outnumbered three to one but he still managed to win. he also lost 2/3rds of his troop in the desertShow MoreRelatedAlexander The Great Of Alexander Essay988 Words   |  4 PagesAlexander became king of Macedonia after his the passing of his father, King Philip II. Within this essay, the information of Alexander will come from three different sources,and be compared to find the similarities in the history of Alexander amongst them. Alexand lived from 356 B.C.E. to 323 B.C.E., dying at the age of thirty-two. The three sources used have many similarities and broaden the history of Alexander, as they include more into the timeline of his life. Referring to the textbook, theRead MoreAlexander The Great : The Characters Of Alexander The Great1222 Words   |  5 PagesFrom the beginning of his short-lived life in Pella, the capital of Macedonia, Alexander the Great was immensely affected by the traits of his mother, father, and tutor. Philip II, king of Macedonia and Alexander’s father, was a man of great strategic ability, and gave Alexander practice in military leadership. This experience and knowledge passed down from his father became useful during his conquest across Europe. Olympias, one of Philip II’s wives and Alexander’s mother, had incredibly strongRead MoreAlexander the Great 1370 Words   |  6 PagesAlexander was born around 356 B.C. His mother was of royal lineage, as was his father, Philip II. When Alexander was fourteen, he studied under the Athenian philosopher, Aristo tle. Perhaps no culture has ever produced a greater mind than Aristotle’s. So searching and profound was Aristotle’s work that in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries A.D. much of the Christian church regarded his teachings as being divinely inspired. No subject was untouched by his contemplation. Philosophy, botany, geographyRead MoreAlexander the Great 1054 Words   |  4 PagesAlexander the Great once said, â€Å"There is nothing impossible to he who tries†. Alexander’s whole life seems to be based off this one quote. From the day he was only a young child till he transitioned into one of the greatest of men, which conquered and ruled the largest empire that ever existed in the world. He accomplished and influenced so much in the world that he is still not forgotten. From his achievements and his positive contributions to the world he is still remembered as a hero. AlexanderRead MoreAlexander The Great Essay846 Words   |  4 PagesKonark Raithatha Alexander the Great Acted as ruler of Macedonia from 336 to 323 B.C. Alexander the Great unified Greece, regenerated the Corinthian League and occupied the Persian Territory. Alexander the Great was born in the Pella region of Macedonia on July 20, 356 B.C., to parents King Philip II of Macedon and Queen Olympia, daughter of King Neoptolemus. The youthful leader and his sibling were upraised in Pella s royal court. While growing up, alexander the dark-eyed and curly-headed hardlyRead MoreAlexander II And Alexander The Great1642 Words   |  7 Pagessomeone who is good at planning tactics; Philip II and Alexander the Great would not fall under this name because they were not good at planning tactics, they were disputed to be the best at planning them. Alexander III the Great was born in 356 BC in the capital of Macedonia; Pella. Growing up Alexander watched his father turn Macedonia into a great military power . Philip II was the first to create an unstoppable Macedonian army and his son Alexander woul d further expand the efficiency and power ofRead MoreAlexander The Great : Why Is Alexander Considered Great?1669 Words   |  7 PagesALEXANDER THE GREAT Why is alexander considered great? Alexander III of Macedon or commonly known as Alexander the Great was the conqueror and king of the Persian Empire which is the Ancient Greek kingdom of Macedon. He was born on the 20/21st July 356 BC in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia. While in reign from 336 to 323 B.C, he united the Greek city-states and led the Corinthian League. He also became the king of Persia, Babylon and Asia as well as created Macedonian colonies in the regionRead MoreAlexander The Great : Alexander The Great And The Persian Empire930 Words   |  4 PagesAlexander the Great was skilled and respected military leader. After inheriting the throne from his father, King Philip II, Alexander would go on to conquer the Persian Empire, unite Greece and spread Hellenistic views across Greece. Alexander being the son of a king was born into royalty. In fact, he had the pleasure of having the great Aristotle as his teacher. It was Aristotle’s job to teach Alexander what he need to know in order to lat er conquer the Persian Empire and to teach him the importanceRead MoreAlexander The Great651 Words   |  3 PagesAlexander The Great is one of the most famous icons of ancient history. He had conquered more territory than anyone else. Alexander was born in Pella the capital of Macedon in July of 356 BC. His mother was Olympias and his father was Philip II ruler of Macedon. From the age of 13-16 Alexander was tutored by the famous Aristotle. Aristotle had taught him about geography, medicine, zoology and lots of other things. Although Alexander still want to learn about military tactics which was his mainRead MoreAlexander The Great Of Alexander IIi Of Macedon1119 Words   |  5 PagesAlexander The Great Alexander III of Macedon Riding Bucephalus Into Battle Alexander III of Macedon or Alexander The Great was born on 20/21 July 356 BC in Pella, Macedon. He was the son of the king of Macedon. Alexander was many things, he was a prince, a king, a general, and much more. Alexander’s father was the King of Macedon, Philip II and his mother was his father’s fourth wife, Olympias, she was the daughter of Neoptolemus I, the king of Epirus. When Alexander was very young he was raised

Diffusion, Dialysis free essay sample

In Diffusion, Dialysis And Osmosis lab, we discovered that we were going to observe and understand the conditions under which diffusion, dialysis, and osmosis occur. Then we constructed models of diffusion, dialysis, and osmosis. We predicted that the direction of change would be from the membrane to the beaker. We understood how these processes affected the selectivity of the cell membrane. The second part of the lab was dealing with dialysis. In this part we studied starch and sodium chloride for dialysis activity. In Part A We hypothesized that NaCl existed in 1-3 and AgNO existed 2-4. In Part B We hypothesized that there will be more changes in the cell then outside the cell. In Part C We hypothesized that there will be a difference due to the different environments that are provide to help change the appearance of a molecule. Procedure A. Qualitative testing for sodium chloride and starch We got 6 clean test tubes and number them 1-6. We will write a custom essay sample on Diffusion, Dialysis or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Test tubes 12 had 5ml of 10% sodium chloride (NaCl). Test tubes 34 had 5ml of starch. Test tubes 56 had 5ml of distilled water. We added 2-3 drops of silver nitrate (AgNO )to 1,3,5. We added 2-3 drops of iodine solution to 2,4,6. B. Dialysis of a starch/sodium chloride mixture Get one dialysis tube and tie one end. Fill the bag with 5ml of 10% Sodium chloride solution and 5ml of starch solution from Part A. then tie the tube and place it in a beaker of distilled water. Leave the tube for 30 minutes. Afterwards test for the presence of starch and sodium chloride. Then split the solution into to test tubes and 2-3 drops of iodine into one test tube and 2-3 drops of AgNO in the other test tube. C. Osmosis using dialysis tubing as a model of the cell membrane Obtain 5 beakers and label them 1-5. Fill beakers 1-4 halfway with distilled water. And beaker 5 with 30% sucrose halfway. Obtain 5 dialysis tubes that will be filled with 10ml of different solutions. Tube 1 has distilled water, Tube 2 has 10% sucrose, Tube 3 has 20% sucrose, Tube 4 has 30% sucrose, and Tube 5 has distilled water. Tie the tubes and weigh each of them before placing them in there respected beakers. Every 15 minutes weigh the tubes to record the change. In Part B we found that outside test tube; salt existed and not sugar. But inside the test tubes both the starch and the salt existed in the two different tubes. In this part there weren’t any problems and we were successful in gathering the necessary results to move to the next section. This helping prove our hypothesis right because it meant that there would be more changes inside the cell than outside the cell. In Part C we found that Beaker 1 had no changes in weight. In Beaker 2 there were changes that ranged from 0-1. 1. In Beaker 3 there were changes that ranged from 0-2. 1. In Beaker 4 there were changes that ranged from 0-4. 8. In Beaker 5 there were changes that ranged from -2. 7-0. This is the results that my group gathered from another group that did well because our results were way off and inconsistent. So we were forced to use better results to find better explanations. We understood that the conditions under which osmosis is possible and to what degree it occurs. There were three different types of temperate environments. This helping prove our hypothesis right because it meant that different environments help change the appearance of a molecule.

The Upstart Assault Case for Meridicom and Telzip - myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theThe Upstart Assault Case for Meridicom and Telzip. Answer: Presentation of the case This fictional case presented by Marco Bertini and Nirmalaya Kumar of the London business titled what do you do when one of your small competitors pulls out its big gun? This case explores the question on the basis of commentaries of George tacker, of Simon Kutcher partner and discusses how small competitors create a bad reaction on the telecom market. This case presents a study of two telecom competitor companies, namely Meridicom and Telzip. Meridicom is known for being the largest established company of telecom which provides high production of several kinds of telecom services, whereas the Telzip is a small company runs with low marketing skills and capability. The disputes arise after a strategy is changed by the telzip company to increase a high market price just as Meridicom Company. Telzip Company shook the market of telecom services by offering to his customers a free broadband services forever. Such offering of Telzip Company provokes a meridicom to take a bold action against Telzip Company. Meridicom Company decided to cut off all his prices of telecom services. Joeseph Ulan, a chief marketing officer of Meridicom Company faces with incompatible directions to provide a discounted rate to all his customers for their products or services. But such discounted idea of concept was rejected by an officer, Joe. The case suggests cannibalizing of the company by a decrease in sales volume, revenue, or market share of telecom products by the meridicom company (McGrath, 2013). Such cannibalizing method increases a greater evil to the outsiders or new comers in the telecom market. The case study created a revelation of nobodys assault scenario in a market. The overview of the case presents that the dominating company loses their grip if his customers switch to their new company. In the case study, Telzip Company does not explore its market strategies in a righteous manner as it provides harm to an interest of other small competitors. This case study sets an illustration of competitive rivalry and its changing aspects. Presentation of Problem or predicament The case begins with advertisement published in financial times which tapered the chief offices joseph face of the Meridicom company progress in one stance. The advertisement published in Financial Times that a Telzip Company is offering free broadband services for life long to his business customers together with landline and mobile services to those present customers who have desire to change their membership from Meridicom services. Such attractive services represent an act of predicament to Meridicom Company. At the instant of the issue that whether Joe should disregard or react to Telzips unflinching step or not. In case, Joseph respond to such unflinching step of Telzips then he should put stress on an implementing a several market policies to attract his customers. Meridiocom Company is a most popular telecom company, but TelZip currently a forerunner in the portable services and with the free broadband services. Telzip is able acquire a dominancy over Meridicoms broadband and landline services. It would be vital step for Meridicom to put stress over Telzips services as he holds a sound and excellence position in a market and require influencing their customers (Clayton et.al. 2016). Presentation of opinions The next step after problem arise in Meridiocom company, a meeting conducted by Joseph a chief head who gather all his administrators in one dining on the twelfth floor of their company building. The meeting presents a several opinions to the hope door or recommendation to defeat telzips new strategy of free broadband services and capture market again with confidence of his customers. Opinions of Adam, Emiline and Frank (division heads of meriodicom company) and Charles DeGraff (sale officer) created a scenario for Joe to take a decision mainly in two circumstances. Firstly, Joe should respond to action against telzips marketing on availing free broadband services to his business customers by elucidate his various drawbacks (Philip Kevin, 2013). Secondly, Joe should not respond to price war against telzips strategy. Such price war would create a bad vision of meridiocom company prestige and goodwill (Bryce et.al. 2011). Adam initiated his conversation by giving relief to Joe that telzips free broadband strategy is not genuine and his strategy is just to fool his business customers. Moreover, Adam also suggests Joe that he does not require doing anything to improve inherent strategies of a company. Another division head, Emeline also supported Adams opinion by stating that if meriodicom company would consider a strategy of small competitors that may result into a great pain for the company as it would disturb complete unit of a company. But out of three division head, Frank puts a contradictory opinion and dissent the views of Adam and Ereline. Frank warns Joe by stating that the Telzip Company is a serious player in the market. According to frank, telzips strategy is a bold one and can easily beat a successful marketing of Meriodicom Company. After meeting gets over, Joe suddenly met with his Charles Degraff, sales officer of the Meriodicom Company at a wine shop. Charles boosts Joe by saying that our company should follow fire with fire concept. If telzip can put his attractive strategy for customer then meriodicom should also focus on his customers. He asserts that meriodicom is expensive for his business customers with no availing attractive offers to be provided by a company. The above opinion sets following factors: Pros of opinion are that company has a huge market where customers would not switch to the Telzip Company without any cross check. Offcourse customers are concerned for excellence services of meriodicom. Discount offer and free broadband services cannot fool customers so easily. Cons of opinion were three bills provided for three services represent complicated service processes provided to customers and all three call centres may fail to seek solution to customers. Such three billing and call centres do not provide satisfactory services of themeriodicom company (Bertini, Marco and Wathieu, 2010). Conclusion As per above opinions, the solution to this case study deals with several recommendations for the meriodicom company against bold action of telzips company. There are as following Firstly, meriodicom company is advised to monitor telzips service quality. Such monitoring can takes place by giving advice to Joe for responding to the price war. A purpose of price war is to bring out competitive showground by providing discount strategy, per second movement record in billing and free services of calling and internet play as foremost weapons for any competitive players. Price cut is a most effective tool to frame any effective strategy to capture market. In the context of this case analysis, meriodicom company should follow a policy of price war to attract his customer at a large scale (Coelho, 2010). Secondly, it is recommended to Joe not to implement practical approach for responding to the Telzip Company by a tool of price attack. A purpose of price attack is to cut off the costing of a company at a very low scale (Duarte, 2012). Such price attack goals can bring consequences of loss to a company which may even create a circumstance of the company winding up due to a severe loss. In order to prevent a loss to a company, it is directed that Joe should not respond to price attack (Stalk, 2007). As per facts of the case, the relationship between quality and price in telecom field is over prevailing to each other. In this theory of relationship, quality prevails in Meriodicom Company whereas price prevails in telzips case. If Joes view is that quality of his company is equal or more than telzips company then Joe should follow the opinion of Charles, sale officer. As per Charles opinion, Joe should follow the strategy of fire with fire that is Joe should also publish an advertisement with a lengthy offer of discount published in front page of the financial times. It will attract business customers of telzips company. If the quality of telzips company is less than meridicom company then Joe is directed to implement a strategy of fire with water. According to theory of fire with water, Joe needs to follow a modest or calm approach towards a bold strategy of telzips company (Luce, 2008). It might results into short term collapse in progress of meridicom company. Thus, it would also lead to provide awareness in a customer for a quality concern rather than low price charges (Stone, 2017). In case of customer would willing to switch to telzips company attractive offer of free broadband then in such circumstance a meridiocom company should prepare his price war strategy (Christensen, 2013). Such action is optional when above stated recommendation may fail. It is important to preserve such price war strategy already before results of customers migration to another company (Wagner Disparte, 2016). References Bertini, Marco Wathieu (2010), "How to stop customers from fixating on price", Harvard business review . pp 84-91 Bryce, D.J., Dyers, J.H., and Hatch, N.W. 2011. "Competing against free products". Harvard Business Review, 89(6), 104-111. Christensen C. 2013. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. New York: Harvard Business Review Press. Clayton M. C, Grant A. Govindarajan V. and. Davenport T.H. 2016. HBR's 10 must Reads 2017: The Definitive Management Ideas of the Year from Harvard Business Review (with bonus article What Is Disruptive Innovation?) (HBR's 10 Must Reads) Harvard Business Review Press Coelho D. 2010. Global graphics: pricing in a new market. London Business School. Duarte N. 2012. HBR Guide to Persuasive Presentations. Harvard Business Press. Luce H.R. 2008. Fortune. California: Time, Incorporated.pp.158. McGrath R. G. 2013. The End of Competitive Advantage: How to Keep Your Strategy Moving as Fast as Your Business. Harvard Business Press. Philip K. Kevin K.L. 2013. Marketing Management. USA: Grada Publishing. Stalk G. 2007. Competing Against Time: How Time-Based Competition is Reshaping Global Market. Simon and Schuster. Stone B. 2017. The Upstarts: How Uber, Airbnb and the Killer Companies of the New Silicon Valley are changing the World. New York: Random House. Wagner D. Disparte D. 2016. Global Risk Agility and Decision Making: Organizational Resilience in the Era of Man-Made Risk. Springer.